|
Post by QC Mike on Sept 27, 2022 21:28:35 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by bonavista on Sept 27, 2022 21:45:43 GMT -7
Mike think you made a slight mistake on the chart. should GF and GA be 6 and 7 for each team respectively?
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Sept 27, 2022 22:15:23 GMT -7
Mike think you made a slight mistake on the chart. should GF and GA be 6 and 7 for each team respectively? Made the same mistake myself when doing it in my head but finals were 4-3 and 2-3 (4+2) and (3+3) [Quad Cities first in both scores]
|
|
|
Post by nash on Oct 26, 2022 8:19:24 GMT -7
I am 3 points out of the playoffs as of October 26th.
|
|
|
Post by nash on Oct 26, 2022 8:26:46 GMT -7
Ryan and I are playing this week, so I may fall back further if he pimps me like Larry did. I've reached out to Adam as well, so I may be drafting Owen Power next year.
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Nov 3, 2022 14:41:11 GMT -7
Sorry for the late update. Just got back from taking my mom to Ottawa to visit my nieces.
|
|
|
Post by nash on Nov 5, 2022 11:19:12 GMT -7
Hey Mike, can you update to reflect a tie between Cremona and Bonavista instead of OTW/OTL please?
Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Nov 5, 2022 12:13:33 GMT -7
Hey Mike, can you update to reflect a tie between Cremona and Bonavista instead of OTW/OTL please? Thanks. Done (and it's just a W - my proposal for different points for OTWs didn't go through so there's no difference between them).
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Mar 12, 2023 15:57:23 GMT -7
Cole Harbour and Oxford have 23 points. Cole Harbour has more wins. Cole Harbour should be ranked higher than Oxford. I’m in 4th, dammit! Don’t make me play a playoff game. 🤬 I am under the impression that first tie breaker is games played regardless of what the new rule book says - based on the 2019-20 rule book and I don't recall voting to change it. Third place it is Shoes.
|
|
|
Post by nash on Mar 13, 2023 11:14:50 GMT -7
I recall that games played was the first tie break to reward participation.
However, since we have these current rules, we can proceed with making changes via proposal.
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Mar 13, 2023 17:18:00 GMT -7
You are correct - it is listed as wins. My bad about that. Guess I'm just going on oral histories.
However, I still feel it should be Games Played as first tie breaker if we want to encourage game playing. Please come up with a scenario where a team is knocked out of the playoffs because a different team chose not to play games that doesn't involve games won as the first tie breaker. I'm trying to come up with a scenario whereby a team is knocked out/down that doesn't involve less than three teams with two cooperating to freeze out the other (if that's happening we have bigger issues)
Team A play 10 games out of 20 and goes 10-0-0. Doesn't play another game. Team B plays 18 games and wins 6, ties 8 and loses 4 - doesn't get to play Team A. They finish tied for 4th on 20 points. Team A makes the playoffs on most wins while Team B advances on games played. I know I'd prefer to have Team B make the playoffs as a reward for getting their games mostly done.
|
|
|
Post by nash on Apr 3, 2023 19:43:39 GMT -7
When I first put the tie break rules in place my intention was to reward teams which played their games, regardless of winning or losing.
I can appreciate what Steve is suggesting, but it also would take considerable collusion for this to happen. We'll vote on the options in the rules proposals in the upcoming season.
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Apr 8, 2023 10:55:26 GMT -7
Steve gets his wish and is finally eliminated from the playoffs. Vanessa can plan to use you around the house as she sees fit.
|
|