|
Post by revelstoke on Jun 22, 2021 7:22:53 GMT -7
Hey all, I was curious - our goalies have 'replacement value' players, but do we have all other positions with the same 'worst player in the league' type card?
In thinking about how poorly my team is set up to play games next year due to injury (IE, I have one single full time RW next year, down from 4.5 of them this year), and Arron's post about how many games he's missing, thought I would ask.
The NHL teams are never stuck, they could just sign all kinds of random replacement players from all kinds of leagues, whether Europe, ECHL, college, etc, if they absolutely needed to. Unfortunately, we do have a roster limit, which is fine, and honestly, this is the first year I can remember that I have game number problems at all, but I thought I'd bring it up.
(with this all said, if anyone has players with games they don't need, I'm sure both Arron and myself need games at a ton of positions) Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by nash on Jun 22, 2021 9:36:25 GMT -7
Thanks for posting this Larry.
Under normal circumstances I wouldn't want to entertain this simply because it discourages trading. However, this is not isolated. In the past we've put League Skaters in place though I can't recall the exact situation. I'm old.
Anyways, I will be choosing a League Forward (who will have a F rating), but will be terrible as well as a League Defenceman, similarly terrible. Picture rookie level Aki Berg.
This is only in consideration of the players who have sat out/retired and unexpectedly impact some teams more than others. This will only be for this season so don't plan on them going forward.
|
|