|
Post by QC Mike on Oct 20, 2023 17:59:31 GMT -7
Unofficial 2023-24 standings
Unofficial 2023-24 Alternate standings
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Feb 14, 2024 0:10:46 GMT -7
Find it interesting how the alternate points system shuffled up the 4-6 positions of the standings if the season were to end today. Which do you think more accurately reflects where you think the teams should be?
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Feb 14, 2024 12:37:03 GMT -7
Looking forward to possible changes to tie breakers, points etc so am showing a snapshot of what future standings could look like.
Since neither ties nor over time losses are used to determine standings I've rolled them into one as they are functionally identical so that it works out as basically 2 pt games, 1 pt games, 0 pt games.
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on Mar 13, 2024 15:58:39 GMT -7
Find it interesting how the alternate points system shuffled up the 4-6 positions of the standings if the season were to end today. Which do you think more accurately reflects where you think the teams should be? 4-7 now in a jumble based on potential 3 point games. Which do you think looks better and why?
|
|
|
Post by Belfast on Mar 16, 2024 13:39:29 GMT -7
I'm not really sure which is "better". I guess it's hard to envision it when there are so many games played difference in the teams. I understand this would be part of the reason to look at it, is the "what if" case where guys dont get their games done.
I think, personally, that the alternate standings look better to me? I mean Brandon with 5 wins in only 7 games, to my mind, SHOULD be placed ahead of Revelstoke with 5 in 12. I guess that goes to winning percentage. However, if the season ended today, Id want to see Larry rewarded for playing more games than Lorne as well so ultimately Im not sure how I feel about that.
I have no doubt that guys will get their games done, so this should be a moot point and the points should reflect a teams winning percentage more than anything.
|
|
|
Post by Oxford United on Apr 5, 2024 8:23:14 GMT -7
At 10th overall and with a +0.44/Game differential, Brooks is the lowest ranked team with a positive differential since Schreiber finished 11th in 2012-13 with +0.56/Game.
Belfast's differential of +3.05 is the third highest in CHL history after Belfast (+4.09 in 2022-23) and Belfast (+3.11 in 2021-22).
Are we witnessing Belfast's decline? The next highest in history is Chelsea's +2.15 in 2017-18. So maybe, but it doesn't seem to matter.
|
|
|
Post by Belfast on Apr 5, 2024 12:45:44 GMT -7
My humble apologies for being Tortorella-esque in my aggressive movements to keep my team at the top for as long as possible......NOT.
Don't worry, I'll run out of capital to stay there at some point.
And my goal differential took a hit with Landeskog being hurt, that's all.
One more year of the President's trophy will mollify my pain while you heathens all toss more hate on the "Burn Belfast" fire.
|
|
|
Standings
Apr 5, 2024 13:36:31 GMT -7
via mobile
Post by Oxford United on Apr 5, 2024 13:36:31 GMT -7
My humble apologies for being Tortorella-esque in my aggressive movements to keep my team at the top for as long as possible......NOT. Don't worry, I'll run out of capital to stay there at some point. And my goal differential took a hit with Landeskog being hurt, that's all. One more year of the President's trophy will mollify my pain while you heathens all toss more hate on the "Burn Belfast" fire. I know that it is hard to accept complements, but a decline to 3.05 is still almost 50% better than any other mark in CHL history. Thus, the decline doesn’t seem to matter because the differential is still otherworldly. That’s the complement.
|
|
|
Post by Belfast on Apr 7, 2024 22:49:33 GMT -7
Thanks dude, I was just being surly sarcastic ;-). I know I've been quite lucky at points, but I do try to make my team the best it can be every year. I'm just not looking forward to the crows feasting on my rotting corpse when the decline comes LOL.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Apr 8, 2024 17:36:19 GMT -7
Brooks record is 8-9-2-1
|
|
|
Post by nash on Apr 18, 2024 9:12:51 GMT -7
It appears there are two different Standings threads.
|
|
|
Post by nash on Apr 30, 2024 4:44:26 GMT -7
Thanks for tracking the Standings Mike.
This season since we're going for 3 rounds, Oxford and Belfast get byes in the first round. Cremona hosts Brooks and Brandon hosts Houston.
Since we've added a round, the first round of the playoffs will be best of 5. I want to see if we can move this along since this is our first year back to 3 rounds. All subsequent rounds will remain best of 7.
This round ends on May 26th.
|
|
|
Post by QC Mike on May 20, 2024 14:14:45 GMT -7
So in the alternate world there's a different lottery order and Chelsea is possibly playing in the off season instead of Brooks.
Take a look and reflect on which you think more accurately reflects where the teams are.
|
|
|
Post by Oxford United on May 20, 2024 17:23:27 GMT -7
It's hard to reflect on this because a system of 3-points games would not have any ties. If we assume (for comparison) that all ties are worth 1.5 points, then the order would change only slightly at the bottom of the table, with Quad Cities and Revelstoke swapping places. # | TEAM | POINTS | 1 | BEL | 57.5 | 2 | OXF | 47.5 | 3 | CRE | 41.5 | 4 | BRA | 40.5 | 5 | HOU | 34.0 | 6 | BRO | 30.0 | 7 | CHE | 29.5 | 8 | VIK | 28.5 | 9 | QCQ | 27.0 | 10 | REV | 26.0 | 11 | BON | 23.5 | 12 | COL | 9.5 |
Or, if you like, sorted by Goal Differential, we'd expect the order to be BEL, OXF, CRE, BRO, BRA, QCQ, HOU, CHE, VIK, REV, BON, COL. Or to put it another way: Bonavista and Cole Harbour always finish 11th and 12th, regardless of system.
|
|
|
Standings
May 20, 2024 17:58:40 GMT -7
via mobile
Post by amack17 on May 20, 2024 17:58:40 GMT -7
It was a tough season...
|
|